What to try for ongoing joint soreness

What to try at home first

Ease any motion that brings on sharp soreness. Keep moving in ways that your joint can handle. You won't help stiffness by staying still too long. A cane or handrail may steady you when needed.

Your clinician may suggest exercise or physical therapy. This care can strengthen the muscles around the joint. It also shows which movements your joint will tolerate. Don't choose a procedure before the cause is clear.

What to ask about clinic care

Cortisone is medicine used to calm swelling for a time. Blood-based care begins when the clinic draws and spins your blood. The spinning gathers platelets, small parts that help blood clot, into the liquid plasma. The clinician puts this platelet-rich plasma, or PRP, inside your aching joint.

Marrow care starts with a needle placed in a pelvic bone. The clinic draws marrow, spins it, and puts the chosen portion where your joint hurts. Each procedure has its own cost and recovery needs. Neither one means that you'll have to stop basic care.

The QC Kinetix medical providers who perform your exam may discuss these regenerative treatments for joint soreness. Ask which procedure fits the exam finding. Also ask whether exercise or medicine needs to continue. Leave knowing exactly what happens to your blood or marrow.

What to check before paying

Get every charge in writing before you agree. The total may include the blood or marrow work. Follow-up and other clinic fees can appear there too. Insurance often doesn't cover PRP or marrow care.

Compare the possible relief with what you'll have to pay. Ask how the clinician will decide whether the care helped. Set a date for checking your daily movement. If you're no better, ask which care comes next.

Sources

1. The AAOS third-edition clinical practice guideline on non-arthroplasty management of knee osteoarthritis contains 29 recommendations and explicitly highlights intra-articular corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid AND platelet-rich plasma as the areas where better research is still needed - including osteoarthritis characterisation, subgroup and severity stratification, control for bias, and cost-effectiveness analysis.

   Brophy RH, Fillingham YA. — AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline Summary: Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (Nonarthroplasty), Third Edition.. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2022. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01233.

2. A network meta-analysis restricted to LARGE randomized trials (at least 100 patients per group; 57 RCTs, 22,795 participants, 18 intra-articular interventions) found treatment effects were consistently larger in the 35 high-risk-of-bias trials than in the 22 low/unclear-risk trials. In the main analysis excluding high-risk trials, triamcinolone had the highest probability of exceeding the minimal important difference at weeks 2 and 6; hyaluronic acid had no effect on pain (SMD -0.04, 95% CrI -0.19 to 0.11, 11 trials) but higher odds of dropouts due to adverse events (OR 2.01) and of serious adverse events (OR 1.86). The effects of 16 of the 18 interventions were smaller than the MID and most were consistent with placebo effects.

   Pereira TV, et al. — Effectiveness and safety of intra-articular interventions for knee and hip osteoarthritis based on large randomized trials: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.014.

3. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 48 Level I-II randomized trials (9,338 knees) with a minimum 6-month follow-up ranked the four commonest intra-articular injections. HA and PRP both significantly improved pain versus placebo; HA, PRP and BMAC all significantly improved function versus placebo. SUCRA rankings were PRP 91.54, BMAC 76.46, HA 53.12, corticosteroid 15.18 and placebo 13.70 - corticosteroid ranked barely above placebo at six months and beyond.

   Jawanda H, et al. — Platelet-Rich Plasma, Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate, and Hyaluronic Acid Injections Outperform Corticosteroids in Pain and Function Scores at a Minimum of 6 Months as Intra-Articular Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.. Arthroscopy, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.037.

4. The only randomized controlled trial of alpha-2-macroglobulin for knee osteoarthritis allocated 75 patients with KL grade 2-3 disease to A2M-rich concentrate, conventionally prepared PRP, or methylprednisolone, with 12-week follow-up. The A2M group improved significantly from baseline on VAS, WOMAC, KOOS and Tegner; the PRP group improved on none; the steroid group improved on Lysholm only. Critically, the CHANGE in scores did not differ significantly between the three groups - A2M was comparable to, not better than, PRP and corticosteroid.

   Thompson K, et al. — The Effectiveness of Alpha-2-Macroglobulin Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee.. Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases, 2024.

5. The 2025 Cochrane review of stem cell injections for knee osteoarthritis pooled 25 randomised trials (1,341 participants) and found that, compared with placebo injection, stem cell injection MAY slightly improve pain (1.2 points better on a 0-10 scale, 7 studies, 445 participants) and function (14.2 points better on a 0-100 scale, 7 studies, 432 participants) up to six months - both rated LOW-certainty evidence, downgraded for indirectness (cell source, preparation and dose varied across studies) and suspected publication bias, since up to three larger RCTs were conducted and withdrawn before reporting results. Radiographic progression was not assessed in any included study.

   Whittle SL, et al. — Stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the knee.. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2025. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013342.pub2.

6. FDA states verbatim of stem cell products, stromal vascular fraction (adipose-derived cells), umbilical cord blood, Wharton's jelly, amniotic fluid and exosome products: 'None of these products have been approved for the treatment of any orthopedic condition, such as osteoarthritis, tendonitis, disc disease, tennis elbow, back pain, hip pain, knee pain, neck pain, or shoulder pain.' The only FDA-approved stem cell products in the United States are blood-forming (hematopoietic progenitor) cells derived from umbilical cord blood, approved only for disorders of blood production, and there are currently NO FDA-approved exosome products.

   U.S. Food and Drug Administration — Consumer Alert on Regenerative Medicine Products Including Stem Cells and Exosomes. FDA (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research), 2020.

7. The 2015 Annals network meta-analysis of 137 studies (33,243 participants) compared oral and injected drugs for knee OA and found ALL interventions significantly outperformed oral placebo for pain, with intra-articular hyaluronic acid the most efficacious (effect size 0.63) and acetaminophen the least (0.18). Intra-articular treatments outperformed NSAIDs, which the authors noted may partly reflect the integrated effect of the injection process itself.

   Bannuru RR, et al. — Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2015. DOI: 10.7326/M14-1231.

8. Medicare's national coverage determination states that CMS covers autologous platelet-rich plasma ONLY for patients with chronic non-healing diabetic, pressure and/or venous wounds, and only inside an approved coverage-with-evidence-development clinical study. Every approved study listed under the NCD is a wound-healing study. There is no Medicare national coverage for PRP in osteoarthritis or tendinopathy, which is why these injections are billed to the patient.

   Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma (Coverage with Evidence Development). CMS.gov, 2024.

9. A meta-analysis of the PLACEBO arms of 73 double-blind trials (5,895 patients) quantified what a saline knee injection alone achieves: statistically and clinically significant improvement in pain, function and quality of life at 1, 3 and 6 months, with responder rates exceeding 50% at all three time points, peaking around 4-8 months and declining by 12 months. Placebo response was stronger in trials with more female participants and in more recently published trials.

   Previtali D, et al. — Placebo response to intra-articular injections in knee osteoarthritis: magnitude, evolution over time, and influencing factors. A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.. EFORT Open Reviews, 2025. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-2025-0022.